notessamuele onelia

Each Platform Is Its Own Business

The Story

Matt Johansen rejects the standard “repurpose everywhere” model. “Most creators make the mistake of treating all platforms the same – repurpose your LinkedIn content to Twitter, Threads, and even Instagram carousels. But Matt discovered that each platform operates like its own universe, each with unique conversion patterns and audience behaviors” (Source 1).

He treats each platform as a separate business with its own job:

Twitter — newsletter conversions. “If I go viral on Twitter, I absolutely get a lot of conversions. If I go viral on Instagram, not a whole lot of conversion there” (Source 1). Long-form threads that translate complex cybersecurity news, with a CTA at the end: “Want to stay on top of news like this? Join over 5k pros who trust me to give them what they need to know every week in cybersecurity” (Source 1).

Instagram — sponsorship revenue, not subscribers. 131K followers, but: “Of 129,000 followers, I probably have maybe high hundreds of people that have subscribed, not thousands” (Source 1). His floor for Instagram Reels is 20,000 views. He deliberately does not run ManyChat comment-triggers because “his audience is so tech-based that he feels like he would lose a lot of followers and hinder his reputation” (Source 1). What Instagram does pay for is sponsorships: “B2B SaaS security companies have closed million-dollar deals directly attributed to his Instagram videos,” which means he can charge “multiple thousands of dollars per sponsored video” even though most videos are a green-screen of him talking over a news story (Source 1).

TikTok — feast or famine, creator fund only. “The algorithm over there is just very strange. I either get like a couple hundred, couple thousand, or I get two million like randomly” (Source 1). Floor 200 views, ceiling 3M+. Best month $2,000 in creator fund; typical month “dozens to hundreds of dollars” (Source 1).

YouTube — evergreen future bet. His first YouTube approach was a Friday recording of the newsletter content. It failed: “Turns out that’s a dumb idea… I’m writing news on Thursday to go out Friday morning – already borderline maybe a few days old. Now you wait till next week” (Source 1). The deeper issue was platform fit: “YouTube rewards evergreen content. If you stumbled on this six months from now, it is a completely useless video” (Source 1).

His new YouTube formula: start with a current event, zoom out to industry implications, focus on lessons that hold up six months later. The reformatted video “what the hell is going on with extensions turning into malware” hit 51K views in five days and 75K in three weeks (Source 1). His editing process is intentionally stripped down — just Descript to cut dead air — taking video production from days down to 2-3 hours (Source 1).

The same anti-perfectionism shows up in interviews: “Now, I think like Rick Rubin, who said, ‘If I showed up and made something honest, that’s a win.’ Some videos flop. Some take off. You can’t predict it. But you can control whether you keep posting” (Source 2).

Lesson for Creators

The “repurpose everywhere” advice assumes platforms are interchangeable distribution. They’re not. They have different audiences with different conversion behaviors, and they’re best understood as separate businesses with different jobs. Matt’s allocation is explicit: Twitter for subscriber conversion, Instagram for sponsorship revenue, TikTok as algorithmic lottery ticket, YouTube as the long-duration bet, newsletter as the durable owned asset. The discipline isn’t picking a platform — it’s refusing to grade them on the same metric. The platform that generates 131K followers but high-hundreds of subscribers is not “underperforming”; it’s doing a different job, and it pays the highest sponsorship rates in the portfolio. Decide what each platform is for, then measure it on that.

Backlinks

External sources